Recently, the French court demanded Valve Remove the points of the user agreement that prevents freely resell the Steam accounts or games from these accounts. There is no final solution yet: Valve He is going to appeal the verdict. The ISFE European Association of Developers believes that the actions of the court can turn out to be a disaster for the industry.
As the head of ISFE Simon Little (Simon Little), the decision of the French court is contrary to the laws of the European Union: they admit that it is extremely easy to copy information on the Internet, so digital goods are necessary.
According to Little, If the decision enters into force, it will extremely negatively affect the desire to invest in the creation, production and publication of products of the entire entertainment sphere of Europe – not only video games. Like, if European authors will not be able to protect their investments and intellectual property, consequences for both the industry and consumers will be disastrous.
In the ISFE press release, it mentions the “doctrine of exhaustion”-the principle by which the goods are resolved after the copyright owner sent this product to the official sale. However, according to ISFE, the doctrine applies only to physical products and does not apply to digital downloads.
The Steam User Agreement was transferred to the European Union court. It is expected that he will decide before the end of 2019.
September 23, 2019 21 Game Company entered the environmental initiative
September 23, 2019 Borderlands 3: Five million in five days and the most successful 2K Games game on PC
The best comments
You might think: ah, nishtyak, what a good law! You can just buy a figure for a penny, play and sell further.
It’s even scary to imagine what will happen if it is accepted. Games will probably become completely free with the animation of jumping out of Lutbox with a probability of 10%.
This will lead to the emergence of https://noverificationcasinos.co.uk/review/ybets/ a secondary digital content market, which will most likely be much larger than its analogue with physical carriers, t.To. It will be possible to make a resale by pressing a pair of buttons, you don’t even have to go anywhere. As a result, the same digital copy will walk on the hands, and the developers will get a hole from the bagel. This, in turn, can lead to degradation of the video market, at least in Europe.
Without roflans, I ask, MB will explain without minuses: why, in fact, this should not apply to digital loads? There is almost 2020 in the yard, digitalization there, the Internet is everywhere, the rejection of physical copies/carriers and other things.
As a result, it turns out that instead of 10 copies sold, the developer receives, at best, one. And if you take into account that all this applies to the purchase of physical copies (where you need to find the buyer, send the disk and make a number of other actions costs), then the numbers will be a disaster for the industry.
And that is why the secondary is worse than piracy. After all, here you still need to take into account a simple thing: if someone pirates a copy, then 100% he would not give money for it, the reason is not important. When buying a used, the player gives 100% for it. Which do not go to the publisher/developer, but in the pocket of a certain Vasya from the 4th entrance.
I don’t think gamers are breaking up to sell all their games. At least I say goodbye to the games from the Steam library is not ready. However, there are such games that I bought (by stupidity, not at first, I did not test in a pirate), and then I realized that I did not like the game. Here I would sell. In general, good games from this law will not suffer. As an example, you can already recall the witcher 3, which in general, you could immediately download from torrents, but on sales, it was not particularly reflected. Everyone wants to have good games in their collection.
Man, each team of developers, even the last indie of the developer has a lawyer at the side. Each country has taxes and reporting, and not everyone is ready to kill the mountains of time with this. Similar dining are primarily lawyers who understand the legislation of the whole of Europe.
It is obvious that the game (film) will buy 2 million. man, and the remaining 6 million. just eat the same game (film) at the first 2x. As a result – sales are not 8, but 2 million.
I did not teach a law in my technosharag well, but I understand correctly that in the territory of each individual state my own trade policy? Yes, this is in France and count, the EU, but there was no talk of other countries.
In the conditions of the same Brexit, the law is some kind of extremely illogical in all respects. And not only because it essentially becomes legalized piracy and loophole in law.
Publishers can (now I will do a corny example, a single for a slightly strange explanation): yes, we agree that the resale should be. But, you see, what a nuance: those keys for digital loading, they are, as it were, disposable – we do not have a technical opportunity to make them resolved. That is, we formally intercess the law, but in practice we can’t-it is difficult to unscrew for such a key in the userid database and change to another
Here, and if, for example, they make a site where it will be possible to buy and sell in a second, then it will be just hell for developers. And they will begin to look for outputs- games services, frittails with a tough donat, the singlepler will simply die
I’ll tell you more. Sometimes I even feel a strong traction to buy a game that I, by subscription PS+ gave, that it would be quite mine (well, as far as possible in the figure), if I liked the game. But I do not think that there are a lot of us so that the publisher does not steam due to resale. Among my acquaintances there is not a single collector at all, it’s scary to think – some even Akki for two start up what would take the game in the folding of the game, brr 8 [.
And if the game did not go, then there is a refund. On PS they really did not bring this, it is a pity, but still.
Publishers hate physical copies and have been trying to destroy this market for 10 years. One of the reasons, secondary market. If you do not paint historical gods for a long time, then it will simply be lost in excess of profit from resale and bindings to the account. And the worst thing is that users will leave for Steam with a demand to introduce this into other stores.
Yes, do not care only if the profit is zero developers and publishers simply will not release games.
Sorry for the typos: “It sounds shitty”* and “Games in Steam”*
From the opportunity to reduce comments brought to SG)
What is the point of making games that cannot bring profits? From the resale of games, publishers do not get anything. For them, the existence of resale of physical copies on consoles is a problem, and you suggest that they lose profit and selling a figure.
As for me, the witcher 3 is inappropriate to remember here. After all, for such a result, the name and means for advertising are required. It is unlikely that small studios will be able to afford such.
CDPR, like everything, started with the bottom of the industry. And here it will be very difficult for the slightly known studios, the time for passing such projects is spent little, which means that even the release will have very small sales due to such a law.
Why should the existence of small studios be worried? Because no one knows what new studio can overshadow Bioware, Obsidian, Id Software, Blizzard and other major developments (it is said loudly, but even among the “grandfathers”, few played the same first witcher or at least bought his license, and without money from sales we would not see the continuation from CDPR)
You do not seem to understand that Steam will be the first swallow, a precedent. Roll up with Valve – they will come for the rest.
Leave a Reply